[2. **MOTION TO RECOMMEND BROWARD MPO APPROVE the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Four Draft Tentative Work Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 - 2028]

YEAR 24 TO 28.

AND WE HAVE SABRINA AUBREY HERE TO INTRODUCE THE ITEM [INAUDIBLE].

GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS JESSICA RUBIO.

I AM THE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR.

I HAVE SABRINA HERE WITH ME AND WE BOTH WILL BE PRESENTED TO YOU TODAY.

IT IS A PLEASURE TO BE HERE TO SHOW YOU THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 24 THROUGH 2028.

AND BEFORE WE START, I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE OVERVIEW OF THE WORK PROGRAM.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

VERY GOOD. I'M HAPPY TO ANNOUNCE THAT THE DISTRICT FOUR WORK PROGRAM IS STABLE.

FDOT, AS YOU MAY KNOW, HAVE RECEIVED ADDITIONAL ALLOCATIONS FROM THE INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AND JOBS ACT.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. FDOT MAINTAINS CONSTRUCTION AND RIGHT OF WAY COSTS ESTIMATES ON AN ANNUAL BASIS.

AND OVERALL I CAN REPORT THAT PROJECT COST SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED WITH RESPECT TO LAST YEAR.

[00:05:02]

OUR GOAL IS TO MAINTAIN PROJECTS THAT WERE COMMITTED IN THE COMMON FOUR YEARS RELATED TO SAFETY, PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE.

NEW PHASES FOR PROJECTS WERE GENERALLY PROGRAMMED IN THE FIFTH YEAR.

THIS IS AN OVERVIEW OF THE WORK CYCLE, THE WORK PROGRAM CYCLE, AND IT STARTS IN JULY WHEN OUR WORK PROGRAM SEASON OPENS.

FDOT PREPARES THE DRAFT [INAUDIBLE] WORK PROGRAM IN COORDINATION WITH THE MPOS AND THE COUNTIES.

WE BALANCE THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM TO THE ALLOCATIONS THAT WE RECEIVE FROM CENTRAL OFFICE.

FROM NOVEMBER THROUGH DECEMBER.

WE PRESENT TO BROWARD, PALM BEACH, MARTIN, ST.

LUCIE, INDIAN RIVER COUNTIES, TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES, AND ALSO THE BOARDS.

IN DECEMBER, WE CONDUCTED A PUBLIC HEARING.

THIS YEAR THE PUBLIC HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 13TH AT 6:30 P.M..

FROM JANUARY THROUGH FEBRUARY, EVERY CENTRAL OFFICE COMPILED THE DISTRICT PLANS TO CREATE THE STATEWIDE PRELIMINARY TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM AND SUBMITS IT TO THE GOVERNOR, THE LEGISLATURE, THE FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.

IN MARCH, THE FDOT HOLDS A STATEWIDE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PRELIMINARY TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM.

JULY 1ST AFTER THE BUDGET IS APPROVED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR, THE FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM IS ADOPTED BY THE FDOT STATE SECRETARY.

AND NOW I WILL PASS IT ON TO SABRINA AUBREY.

SHE WILL HIGHLIGHT THE PROJECTS FOR THIS CYCLE.

GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M SABRINA AUBREY.

I'M THE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ENGINEER AT FDOT DISTRICT FOUR, AND I'M HAPPY TO BE HERE TO GO OVER YOUR LIST OF PROJECTS THAT YOU'VE PRIORITIZED AND GIVE YOU SOME GOOD NEWS ON WHAT WE WERE ABLE TO PROGRAM IN THE FIVE YEAR.

SO FIRST UP, YOUR UPWP, WE WERE ABLE TO FUND THAT FROM FISCAL YEAR 23 THROUGH 28.

AND THEN YOUR NEXT PROGRAM, YOUR COMPLETE STREETS LOCALIZED INITIATIVE PROGRAM, YOUR C SLIPPROGRAM, THESE PROJECTS ARE TYPICALLY DELIVERED THROUGH LAB.

SO ANYTHING THAT YOU SEE IN ITALICS, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE ABLE TO FUND THIS CYCLE.

SO, FOR EXAMPLE, NUMBER ONE PRIORITY WAS THE CITY OF WESTON VARIOUS LOCATION THAT WAS ALREADY PROGRAMED.

DESIGN WAS IS FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 26.

SO THAT'S NOT NEW.

AND TYPICALLY BETWEEN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, WE HAVE THREE FISCAL YEARS.

SO THAT'S WHY YOU DON'T SEE THE CONSTRUCTION IN THIS FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM THAT THAT SHOULD COME IN FISCAL YEAR 29 DURING NEXT CYCLE.

SO YOU'LL KIND OF SEE THAT AS WE GO THROUGH THE LIST OF PROJECTS.

SO ON NUMBER TWO YOUR SOUTH SOUTHWEST 81ST AVENUE FROM MCNABB TO THE C-14 GREENWAY THAT WAS ALREADY FUNDED LAST YEAR IN FISCAL YEAR FOR DESIGN AND FISCAL YEAR 25.

AND SO CONSTRUCTION WAS THAT WAS NEWLY FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 28 THIS YEAR.

SO AND THEN DESIGN WAS FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 26 FOR HONEY HILL.

SO CONTINUING THROUGH YOUR LIST FOR CSLIP, A LOT OF THESE ARE FUNDED FOR DESIGN AND FISCAL YEAR 26.

SO NUMBER FOUR, FIVE AND SIX ARE ALL FUNDED FOR DESIGN AND THEN WE WERE ABLE TO FUND NUMBER SEVEN CITY OF LAUDERHILL VARIOUS LOCATIONS SO THAT WILL DESIGN FUNDED IN 28.

SO TYPICALLY NEW PHASES OR NEW PROJECTS ARE IN THE NEW FIFTH YEAR.

SO THAT'S WHY YOU'RE SEEING THAT DESIGN IN FISCAL YEAR 28.

AND THEN YOUR NUMBER EIGHT PRIORITY FOR CSLIP TYLER STREET IS ALSO FUNDED FOR DESIGN IN FISCAL YEAR 28 . FOR NUMBER NINE FOR THE VISUAL MONITORS AT THE TRI RAIL STATIONS.

WE WERE ABLE TO ADVANCE THAT INTO CURRENT YEAR, WHICH IS FISCAL YEAR 23.

SO THAT'S A FLEX [INAUDIBLE] FOR THOSE FUNDS.

SO YOUR NEXT PROGRAM IS YOUR COMPLETE STREETS MASTER PLAN.

SO WE WERE ABLE TO FUND SEVERAL OF THESE.

SO UNIVERSITY DRIVE CONSTRUCTION IS FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 28, SAMPLE ROAD FROM BLOUNT ROAD TO NORTHEAST THIRD AVENUE.

DESIGN WAS FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 28 AND THEN ALSO DIXIE HIGHWAY.

THE NUMBER FIVE PRIORITY, OAKLAND PARK BOULEVARD.

THAT'S A FEASIBILITY STUDY CURRENTLY BEING DONE BY THE MPO.

SO FUTURE PHASES WILL ARE CURRENTLY NOT FUNDED, BUT ONCE WE HAVE MORE INFORMATION FROM THE FEASIBILITY STUDY, WE'LL BE ABLE TO PROGRAM FUTURE PHASES.

PEMBROKE ROAD FROM SOUTHWEST 145TH AVENUE TO FLAMINGO DESIGN WAS ALREADY FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 25 AND WE WERE ABLE TO FUND THE CONSTRUCTION IN FISCAL YEAR

[00:10:03]

28. NUMBER 13.

THIS IS 17TH STREET FROM US ONE TO CORDOVA ROAD.

WE CURRENTLY HAVE PROGRAMED ALSO A RESURFACING PROJECT IN THAT AREA.

SO WE'RE CURRENTLY THE DEPARTMENT IS CURRENTLY LOOKING AT WHAT SCOPE FROM THIS PRIORITY WE CAN ADD INTO THE RESURFACING.

SO OUR CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT UNIT AND OUR PLANNING OFFICE IS CURRENTLY LOOKING AT IT RIGHT NOW AND WE'LL BE LOOKING AT WHAT WE CAN ADD TO THE RESURFACING AND THAT'S THAT THE DESIGN FOR THAT RESURFACING PROJECT WILL START IN 24 WITH CONSTRUCTION IN 27.

SO MOVING ON TO YOUR ROADWAY PRIORITY LIST.

THE NUMBER ONE PRIORITY, PEMBROKE ROAD.

WE WERE ABLE TO FULLY FUND THAT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND FISCAL YEAR 28.

AND THEN NUMBER TWO, WHICH IS THE US ONE AT SUNRISE BOULEVARD THAT HAD STARTED THIS YEAR AND WE WERE ABLE TO FUND THE DESIGN PHASE IN FISCAL YEAR 25.

WE ACTUALLY WERE ABLE TO ADVANCE IT, SO THAT WAS GOOD NEWS, I THINK IT WAS IN 26.

SO THAT'S THAT WAS GOOD NEWS FOR THE NUMBER TWO PRIORITY.

NUMBER THREE IS PINES BOULEVARD FROM US 27 TO NORTHWEST 196 CURRENTLY.

PDE ANY SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES STARTED IN CURRENT YEAR.

THE PD&E STARTS IN FISCAL YEAR 25 AND THE DESIGN WAS DEFERRED TO FISCAL YEAR 27 TO ACCOMMODATE SCHEDULING FOR THE PROJECT.

NUMBER FOUR PINES BOULEVARD AT FLAMINGO.

WE HAVE THE PRELIMINARY PHASES FOR THE PD&E, THE FEASIBILITY, THE PD&E STARTING IN FISCAL YEAR 25.

AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE DESIGN IN FISCAL YEAR 27.

SO WE HAVE ALL THE PRELIMINARY PHASES AND DESIGN PHASES PROGRAM FOR THAT.

POWERLINE ROAD FROM SOUTHWEST 10TH TO BROWARD, PALM BEACH COUNTY LINE.

THE PD&E PRELIMINARY PHASES WILL START IN 25 AND PD&E STARTS IN 26.

AND WE WERE ABLE TO PROGRAM THE DESIGN PHASE IN FISCAL YEAR 28.

SO THEN WE MOVE ON TO STATE ROAD 7 AND COMMERCIAL.

WE HAVE PRELIMINARY ACTIVITIES STARTING IN FISCAL YEAR 25 FOR THE PD&E.

THEN WE HAVE SOUTHWEST 130TH AVENUE, THE PD&E STARTING IN 25.

AND THEN WE HAVE DESIGN PROGRAM IN 28.

136 WE WERE ABLE TO PROGRAM THE DESIGN PHASE IN 28 WITH PD&E STARTING A LITTLE A COUPLE OF YEARS EARLIER.

AND THEN WE HAVE SHERIDAN FROM DIXIE TO US-1 WITH PRELIMINARY PHASES STARTING IN 26 AND 27.

SO WE HAVE A FEW RESILIENCY PROJECTS THAT YOU HAD PRIORITIZED.

SO THAT NUMBER 10, NUMBER 15 AND NUMBER 16 WERE GROUPED TOGETHER AS PART OF THE SOUTHEAST BROWARD RESILIENCY STUDY, PHASE ONE.

AND THAT'S GOING TO BE STARTING IN FISCAL YEAR 26.

SO A STUDY WILL FIRST BE DONE AND THEN WE'LL LOOK TO PROGRAM FUTURE PHASES BASED ON WHAT COMES OUT OF THAT STUDY.

NUMBER 11 IS ACTUALLY THREE ONGOING PROJECTS THAT IS CURRENTLY BEING IN-HOUSE.

IT'S ACTUALLY PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT, THE MPO, THE CITY AND THE COUNTY, ALL CONTRIBUTING FUNDS FOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ALONG THAT CORRIDOR ON A1A IN THE CITY OF HOLLYWOOD.

IT WAS DEFERRED ONE YEAR INTO FISCAL YEAR 24 DUE TO PERMITS, BUT THE PROJECT IS ONGOING AND WILL BE LIGHTING NEXT YEAR.

AND THEN WE HAVE A NUMBER 12 AND 13.

WE'RE BOTH IN THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, SO THAT'S THE US-1 CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE RESILIENCY STUDY, PHASE ONE, AND THAT'S ALSO STARTING IN FISCAL YEAR 26.

THEN WE HAVE A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR DIXIE HIGHWAY THAT WAS ALREADY PROGRAMED LAST YEAR IN 27 AND YOUR NUMBER 21 PRIORITY, GRIFFIN ROAD AT OLD GRIFFIN ROAD INTERSECTION.

THAT'S PART OF A LARGER PROJECT THAT THE PD&E STARTED IN CURRENT YEAR AND THE DESIGN IS FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 26.

OAKLAND PARK AT STATE ROAD 7 AND PINES BOULEVARD AT UNIVERSITY DRIVE.

WE HAVE PRELIMINARY SUPPORT ACTIVITIES STARTING IN CURRENT YEAR AND A FEASIBILITY STUDY STARTING IN FISCAL YEAR 26 TO LOOK AT BOTH OF THOSE INTERSECTIONS BEFORE MOVING ON TO PD&E PHASES AND OTHER FUTURE PHASES.

UNIVERSITY DRIVE AT ROYAL PALM.

THIS IS A FEASIBILITY STUDY STARTING IN 27 AND THEN FOR NUMBER 26 AND 27.

[00:15:06]

WE ALSO HAVE OTHER FEASIBLE CITIES IN FISCAL YEAR 27.

AS THOSE MOVE ALONG, WE'LL BE ABLE TO PROGRAM FUTURE PHASES, WHETHER IT'S A PD&E OR A DESIGN PHASE AND SO FORTH IN THE FUTURE DURING FUTURE CYCLES.

JUST TO HIGHLIGHT SOME OF YOUR SAFETY PROJECTS, YOUR NUMBER ONE AND TWO PRIORITIES FOR ON SYSTEM AND OFF SYSTEM SAFETY PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY.

WE WERE ABLE TO FUND THOSE IN 27 AND THEN WE HAVE FOR TRANSIT NUMBER FOUR PRIORITY SFRTA LEVERAGING SOME TRIP FUNDS THAT WAS ADVANCED INTO FISCAL YEAR 23.

JUST SOME OTHER PROJECTS THAT THE DEPARTMENT HAS ONGOING IN THE WORK PROGRAM, THE 75 INTERCHANGE AT ROYAL PALM . FROM GRIFFIN TO ROYAL BOULEVARD, THAT'S CONSTRUCTION THAT WAS WE WERE ABLE TO FUND THAT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND FISCAL YEAR 28.

THAT CONSTRUCTION AND CEI IS ESTIMATED AT $151 MILLION.

THE I-75 EAST SIDE RAMP IMPROVEMENTS AT GRIFFIN ROAD, WE WERE ABLE TO FUND THAT IN FISCAL YEAR 28 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND I 75 IS SOUTH OF GRIFFIN ROAD TO SOUTH OF I-75/ I-595 INTERCHANGE.

THAT'S A STAND ALONE LANDSCAPE PROJECT ALSO IN FISCAL YEAR 28.

WE ALSO HAVE THE BROWARD COMMUTER RAIL.

WE WERE ABLE TO WE HAVE FUNDING FOR THAT FROM FISCAL YEAR 25 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 28 FOR $7,574 MILLION FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE FEC CORRIDOR.

WE ALSO HAVE A MOVABLE BRIDGE REHAB ON COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD BRIDGE OVER THE INTERCOASTAL THAT'S DESIGNED IN FISCAL YEAR 24 AND CONSTRUCTION FISCAL YEAR 27. AND THEN WE HAVE SOME LIGHTING ALONG I-75 FOR DESIGN IN 24 AND CONSTRUCTION IN 27.

SO AND THEN A FEW OTHER PROJECTS.

WE HAVE SOME BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE THAT WERE FUNDED THROUGH THE STATE.

SO THERE'S FOUR OF THOSE BRIDGES FISCAL YEAR 23 FOR DESIGN AND THEN CONSTRUCTION, FISCAL YEAR 27.

WE ALSO HAVE ADVANCED RUNWAY DETECTION SYSTEM.

WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO FUND THAT FOR DESIGN IN 24.

AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE LOTS IF YOU LOOK IN OUR WORK PROGRAM, WE HAVE A LOT OF RESURFACING PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY.

SO THOSE WILL START IN FISCAL YEAR 24 AND CONSTRUCTION IN 27.

THOSE ARE THE NEW RESURFACING PROJECTS IN THE WORK PROGRAM.

THERE'S ALSO SO THAT.

JUST A REMINDER, THE PUBLIC HEARING JESSICA MENTIONED, IT IS DECEMBER 13TH AT 6:30.

IT'S GOING TO BE HELD ONLINE OR IN PERSON AT OUR AT THE DISTRICT FOUR HEADQUARTERS AT OUR RICK CHESSER AUDITORIUM.

AND YOU CAN REGISTER TO ATTEND ONLINE ALSO.

SO WITH THAT, JESSICA AND I ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SABRINA.

QUESTIONS. NATALIE.

[INAUDIBLE] OKAY.

IT'S GOT SOME ERROR MESSAGES GOING ON HERE.

I'LL JUST CLOSE THEM. SEE IF IT WORKS.

TRY IT NOW. OKAY.

IT WORKED. HERE I AM.

OKAY. I SAW THE IN THE DRAFT.

THE ADVANCING OF THE ROLLING STOCK INTO FISCAL YEAR 23.

HOWEVER, [INAUDIBLE] AND THE MPO HAD PRIORITIZED ROLLING STOCK IN FISCAL YEARS 27 AND 28, AND I DIDN'T SEE THAT REFLECTED IN THE PACKAGE. RIGHT.

SO THE THE ROLLING STOCK WAS APPLIED FOR THROUGH THE TRIP AND MATCHED WITH THE SU FUNDS.

SO THAT'S ALSO DEPENDING ON FUNDING AVAILABILITY WITH THE TRIP FUNDS.

SO WE WERE ABLE TO ADVANCE THE ROLLING STOCK INTO FISCAL YEAR 23, BUT I KNOW WE'VE BEEN HAVING SOME CONVERSATIONS, SO WE'LL SEE WHAT WE CAN DO IN FUTURE CYCLES OR IN FUTURE YEARS TO SEE HOW WE CAN CONTINUE TO FUND ROLLING STOCK FOR SFRTA.

THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? MICHAEL. GOOD AFTERNOON, JESSICA.

CAN YOU GO TO YOUR CSLIP PAGE? SURE. THERE WAS A PROJECT THAT MAYBE EITHER YOU OR DEERFIELD COULD ANSWER WITH SOME.

DIXIE HIGHWAY, I THINK FROM SAMPLE.

TO NUMBER FOUR.

DOES THAT AT THE BROWARD PALM BEACH COUNTY LINE.

[00:20:04]

THERE'S A THERE'S A BRIDGE THAT GETS YOU OVER TO THE FEC.

DOES THAT INCLUDE THE BRIDGE? I'M NOT SURE I'D HAVE TO LOOK INTO THAT.

MAYBE THE DESCRIPTION CAN BE PHRASED IN A WAY THAT'S.

THAT JUST CLARIFIES THAT.

YEAH. THANK YOU.

WE'LL PROVIDE AN ANSWER.

I'LL LOOK INTO IT.

YEAH. WE HAVE A VIRTUAL HAND-RAISED? YES. CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT THE ITALICIZED MEAN AGAIN? THE IT MEANS THAT IT WAS IT WAS ADDED DEFERRED OR ADVANCED AND AS PART OF THIS WORK PROGRAM CYCLE.

SO IF IT'S NOT THAT MEANS IT WAS PROGRAMED ALREADY IN A PREVIOUS CYCLE AS PART OF THE WORK PROGRAM SO.

OKAY, UNDERSTOOD.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A COUPLE AND I WILL DO MY STANDARD EVERY YEAR.

IT'S REALLY FRUSTRATING TO GET THIS A DAY BEFORE WE HAVE TO VOTE ON IT AND LOOK THROUGH 90 PAGES OF PROJECTS.

AND I LIKE THE NEW FORMAT FROM LANDSCAPE TO PORTRAIT, BUT I THINK SOME OF THE FIELDS ARE MISSING, LIKE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT.

SO ONE OF MY QUESTIONS WAS THERE'S ONE THAT JUST SAYS COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD BRIDGE.

IT DOESN'T SAY WHERE WHAT IT'S ABOUT.

AND THERE ARE SOME BIGGER PROJECTS THAT USED TO HAVE THE DESCRIPTIONS, LIKE THE MOVABLE BRIDGE INTEGRATION.

IT USED TO SAY WHICH BRIDGES AND THAT DESCRIPTION SECTION IS NOW MISSING.

SO IT'S A CHALLENGE THEN TO COMPARE OUR PROJECTS WHEN THERE ISN'T THE DESCRIPTIONS ANYMORE OF WHAT THEY EVEN ARE.

SO, YES.

SO IT WAS A CHANGE THIS YEAR.

AND ACTUALLY THE DISTRICT FOUR PRESENTED BEFORE A LOT OF DETAIL.

HOWEVER, IF WE'RE USING A SYSTEM THAT IS MADE BY CENTRAL OFFICE AND WHERE IT PULLS THE PROJECTS IN THE SAME WAY FOR THE STATE, AND WE UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF FIELDS WERE REMOVED, BUT WE CAN ALSO PROVIDE ANOTHER REPORT, MAYBE NEXT TIME, YOU KNOW, WE WILL ALWAYS PULL THAT CITIZEN'S REPORT FROM THE GENERAL WEBSITE.

BUT THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS WILL HAVE TO BE PULLED IN ANOTHER WAY.

NOW, BECAUSE WE'RE USING THE CENTRAL OFFICE STANDARDIZED REPORT NOW.

AND MAYBE USE IT AS SHARING TO THEM THAT YOU'VE BEEN GETTING FEEDBACK THAT THAT'S NOT HELPFUL.

WE WILL GET BACK TO THEM.

I UNDERSTAND DISTRICT FOUR IN GENERAL IS USED TO ADDITIONAL DETAIL, BUT I WILL PROVIDE THAT FEEDBACK FROM.

SURE. THANK YOU.

AND WE HAVE INFORMATION ON THE PRIOR PROJECT, THE DIXIE HIGHWAY.

MICHAEL, GOING BACK TO YOUR QUESTION, AND THIS IS.

SIDEWALK GAPS.

THERE IS NO BRIDGE INCLUDED HERE.

BIKE LANE CYCLES, PEDESTRIAN LEVEL LIGHTING, SOME CONCRETE INTERSECTION.

AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS INCLUDED IN THE ADDED PROJECT, INFORMATION THAT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

SO WE APOLOGIZE FOR THAT, BUT WE'LL TRY TO GET THAT CHANGED NEXT YEAR.

AND I DID HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD BRIDGE YOU TALKED ABOUT, BECAUSE THERE WAS A PREVIOUS PROJECT TO LOOK AT MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS ON COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD. THAT WAS SOONER THAN THE NEW PROJECT THAT YOU TALKED ABOUT.

SO ARE THEY BEING COMBINED TOGETHER? I WAS CONFUSED IN THE TWO DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD PROJECTS BECAUSE THE SECOND ONE, AS I SAID, HAD NO DESCRIPTION ABOUT WHAT THE BRIDGE WAS OVER.

IF IT'S THE INTERCOASTAL, WHAT THE DESCRIPTION WAS.

I'D HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU TO SEE WHAT THE EXACT SCOPE OF THE PROJECT IS AND SEE IF THAT SCOPE WAS COMBINED [INAUDIBLE].

OKAY. THANK YOU.

AND THEN I DID NOTICE THAT THERE WAS A MULTIMODAL PROJECT FOR THE OAKLAND PARK BOULEVARD BRIDGE, AND THAT'S NOW BEEN REMOVED.

AND I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU HAD ANY INFORMATION ON WHY THAT WAS REMOVED WITH DOING MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WEST OF THE INTRACOASTAL.

WE WERE EXCITED ABOUT THAT POSSIBILITY TO MAKE IT BETTER FOR PEOPLE TO GET OVER THE BRIDGE.

BUT IT WAS IN 24-25 FOR ENGINEERING ABOUT $2 MILLION AND NOW IT'S GONE OUT OF THE PROJECT.

THERE'S COMMERCIAL IN OAKLAND PARK, BUT THAT THERE'S NOT OR NOT OAKLAND PARK, THE OTHER BRIDGES.

BUT OAKLAND PARK'S BEEN REMOVED FOR SOME REASON.

OVER THE INTERCOASTAL? NOT IN THE NEW REPORT, YOU MEAN, RIGHT? YEAH, IT WAS IN LAST YEAR'S, BUT IT'S NOT IN THIS YEAR.

[00:25:03]

I'LL GET BACK TO YOU. OKAY.

YEAH. AND I WOULD NOT BE IN FAVOR OF THAT.

BEING REMOVED IS A REALLY IMPORTANT CONNECTION.

OKAY. AND YOU ANSWER MY CORDOVA, I WILL COMPLIMENT.

I LOVE THE FORMAT. YOU DID THE PRESENTATION.

SUPER HELPFUL TO UNDERSTAND HOW IT CONNECTS TO WHAT WE'RE DOING AT THE MPO AND THE PRIORITIES AND ALL OF THAT.

AND YOU DID THE CORDOVA ROAD.

I HAD A QUESTION ON WHY THERE WERE TWO DIFFERENT ONES.

SO YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION ON THAT ONE.

WE HAVE ANOTHER RAISED HAND.

SALVADOR ZUNIGA.

GOOD AFTERNOON. CAN YOU HEAR ME? IF YOU COULD SPEAK UP A LITTLE BIT.

YES, PLEASE. HI.

GOOD AFTERNOON. YES, I HAD A QUESTION ON THE ON THE REPORT THAT WAS PUBLISHED ON 11/17.

I SAW ONE OF THE PROJECTS, 449643, 148 AVENUE FROM BASS CREEK TO MIRAMAR PARKWAY.

THERE WAS FUNDING ON 2028 FOR $1.5 MILLION.

I DON'T THINK I SAW IT IN THE PRESENTATION.

WAS THAT REMOVED? WE DIDN'T NECESSARILY PRESENT EVERY PROJECT, BUT OUR COUNTY.

YOU GUYS HAVE A LOT OF PROJECTS ON YOUR PRIORITY LIST.

SO WE DIDN'T PRESENT EVERYTHING THAT WAS PART OF THE WORK PROGRAM.

SO THE REPORT THAT YOU GOT HAS ALL THE PROJECTS THAT WERE PROGRAM AS PART OF THE WORK PROGRAM.

WE JUST HIGHLIGHTED SOME OF THE PROJECTS FROM YOUR PRIORITY LIST AND AND OTHERS.

OKAY. UNDERSTOOD.

THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? NO SEEING NONE.

THANK YOU. SO I WILL ASK FOR A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE MPO APPROVE THE FDOT DISTRICT FOUR DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 24 TO 28.

YOU COULD RECRAFT TO BE CONTINGENT ON ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR WITH CONCERNS REGARDING THE ITEMS THAT ARE MISSING OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION [INAUDIBLE].

IF YOU GIVE US JUST A MINUTE, PETERS PRESENT DOES HAVE A SHORT PRESENTATION TO MAKE RELATED TO THIS ITEM.

IT JUST NEEDS TO GET RE QUEUED UP.

OKAY. SURE.

WE'LL HOLD THAT THOUGHT THEN ON THE MOTION.

SORRY, FOLKS. PETER GOETZ WITH THE BROWARD MPO.

I THINK THE PRESENTATION IS GETTING PULLED UP.

AND I THINK, MADAM CHAIR, AS YOU MENTIONED, WHEN THINGS ARE ON TIGHT TIMEFRAME, WE'RE ALSO ON A TIGHT TIME FRAME TO REVIEW THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM AND PULL EVERYTHING TOGETHER. AND LITERALLY UP UNTIL THE TAC MEETING, WE'RE PULLING INFORMATION TOGETHER.

SO THAT'S PROBABLY WHY THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF CONFUSION THERE.

SO WHILE THE PRESENTATION IS GETTING PULLED UP, WE GET THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM HERE ON THE STAFF SIDE AT THE MPO AND WE GO THROUGH ALL ALL THE PROJECTS THAT ARE IN THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM WITHIN THE PLANNING AND PROGRAMING TEAM, AND WE MAKE SURE THAT THE PROJECTS THAT ARE BEING PROGRAMED ARE BEING PROGRAMED CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTI MODAL PRIORITIES LIST AS WELL AS OUR METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN, BECAUSE BOTH OF THESE ARE OUR GUIDING DOCUMENTS.

SO THAT'S SORT OF WHAT I'LL START OUT HERE WITH MY PRESENTATION IS THAT EVERYTHING THAT WE DO IN TERMS OF GETTING TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM DEPENDS ON THE CORE PRODUCTS THAT WE PRODUCE HERE, STARTING WITH THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN, WHICH THEN GETS TRANSLATED INTO MULTIMODAL PRIORITIES LIST, ULTIMATELY INTO THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM AND THEN FINALLY INTO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.

SO I WANT TO KIND OF START WITH A FUNNEL HERE.

I'M GOING TO START VERY BIG PICTURE AND THEN KIND OF WORK MY WAY DOWN TO SOME OF THE INCONSISTENCIES THAT WE IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM FROM AN MPO STAFF PERSPECTIVE. SO BEAR WITH ME.

COME ON A SHORT JOURNEY.

I'LL TRY AND I'LL TRY AND MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE ALONG FOR THE RIDE.

RIGHT. SO AGAIN, BIG PICTURE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN IS WHERE WE HAVE ALL OF OUR PRIORITIES IN THERE.

WE CANNOT SPEND ANY FEDERAL DOLLARS ON A PROJECT UNLESS IT IS MENTIONED THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN, SO THAT THAT BASICALLY CASCADES DOWN THAT ENTIRE

[00:30:08]

SET OF BLUE SQUARES THAT YOU SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN.

SO STARTING WITH THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN, LOOKING BACK TO THE 2045, WE HAVE TOTAL REVENUES OVER THE 25 YEAR OF THE PLAN EQUALING ABOUT $12.75 BILLION.

THIS COMES DIRECTLY FROM FDOT THROUGH A REVENUE FORECAST.

AND WE THEN BASICALLY INCORPORATE THAT REVENUE FORECAST INTO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND ASSIGN IT TO PROJECTS.

I DO WANT TO DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO A VERY SMALL SLICE OF THE PIE HERE, WHICH IS THE $540 MILLION THAT YOU SEE HERE IN DARK BLUE AND HIGHLIGHTED BY THE RED OUTLINE.

THESE ARE OUR MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS.

THESE ARE VERY, VERY FLEXIBLE FUNDS, BUT THEY'RE ALSO SOMETHING THAT WE TAKE VERY SERIOUSLY BECAUSE THOSE FUNDS CAN BE SPENT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM, THEY CAN BE SPENT OFF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM, THEY CAN BE SPENT ON CAPACITY PROJECTS, THEY CAN BE SPENT ON ROADWAY PROJECTS.

AND SO WHAT WE DECIDED AS PART OF THE 2045 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS BOARD DIRECTION, IS WE SAID THAT THESE $540 MILLION OF FUNDS ARE PROBABLY BEST SPENT OFF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

AND THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE THE STATE FUNDING CAN ONLY BE SPENT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

SO LET'S KEEP THE STATE FUNDS ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

TAKE THAT SMALL AMOUNT OF $540 MILLION OF MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS AND PUT THAT ON OFF SYSTEM PROJECTS, BECAUSE THE WHOLE POINT OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE SPENDING FUNDS EFFICIENTLY IF THERE IS A LARGE POT OF STATE FUNDING THAT YOU SEE HERE IN THE LIGHT BLUE ALLOCATED FOR STATE ROADS, LET'S MAKE SURE THOSE STAY ON THE STATE ROADS. LET'S THEN TAKE THE SMALLER POT OF MONEY, THE $540 MILLION, AND MAKE SURE THAT'S ALLOCATED TO OFF SYSTEM FACILITIES SO THAT WE CAN TAKE CARE OF THE NEEDS OF THE LOCALS. NOW WHAT WE DID THEN AS WELL WITH THIS MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDING IS WE WENT TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEES AND THE MPO BOARD AND WE SPLIT UP THE FUNDING. SO WHAT YOU'LL SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN IS OUR SIX FUNDING PROGRAMS THAT ARE IN THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND YOU'LL SEE THAT SPLIT UP BY FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING THAT CAN BE SPENT ON THE ON SYSTEM, ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM, AND THEN THE GREEN FUNDS, WHICH CAN BE SPENT OFF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM OR HAVE MORE FLEXIBILITY THROUGH MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDING.

NOW, WHAT YOU'LL SEE HERE AS WELL IS THAT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE HAVE COMPARED TO STATE FUNDING IS VERY, VERY SMALL IN EACH OF THESE BUCKETS.

BUT WE WERE VERY DELIBERATE ABOUT WHERE WE PUT THAT FUNDING.

AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE ONCE AGAIN THAT THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN IS COST FEASIBLE.

IT'S COST CONSTRAINED, WHICH MEANS THE PROJECTS THAT WE ALLOCATE AND THE TYPES OF FUNDING THAT WE ALLOCATE ON THOSE PROJECTS MAINTAIN THAT COST FEASIBILITY WITHIN THE PLAN.

SO WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE ADHERING FROM A FEDERAL PERSPECTIVE TO THESE ALLOCATIONS BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT WE TOLD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HOW WE WERE GOING TO ALLOCATE AND HOW WE WERE GOING TO SPEND OUR FUNDING.

SO IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE TRANSLATE THAT INTO THE MULTIMODAL PRIORITIES LIST.

AND SPECIFICALLY ON THE MULTIMODAL PRIORITIES LIST, YOU'LL SEE THAT WE WE NOTE WHAT OWNERSHIP THE ROADWAY IS ON EACH PROJECT AND WHAT FUNDING SOURCE WE WOULD LIKE THE DEPARTMENT TO USE.

AND THAT FUNDING SOURCE IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND IN OUR COST FEASIBLE PLAN.

SO ONCE AGAIN, THE IDEA THAT WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP STATE FUNDS ON STATE ROADS AND MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS OR OURMORE FLEXIBLE FEDERAL FUNDS OFF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM, WHAT WE NOTICED THIS YEAR WHEN WE WERE GOING THROUGH THE.

TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM IS THAT THERE WERE ABOUT 17 PROJECTS THAT WERE ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM THAT HAD A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF FEDERAL MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS ON IT, AND THAT'S TO THE TUNE OF ABOUT $42.8 MILLION.

NOW, WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT WE ARE GOING TO TRY AND WORK WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION TO THIS DISCREPANCY.

AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE ADHERING TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN BECAUSE $42.8 MILLION IS NOT REALLY A ROUNDING ERROR WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE BIGGER POT OF $540 MILLION WHEN YOU'RE COMPARING IT TO THE $7 BILLION OF STATE FUNDING MAY BE, BUT FOR THE $540 MILLION, IT IS VERY, VERY SIGNIFICANT.

AND WHAT THAT ALSO MEANS IS THAT THESE ARE FUNDS THAT ARE NOT ABLE TO BE SPENT ON OTHER MPO PRIORITIES OFF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

SO IDEALLY WHAT WE WOULD LIKE IS WE'D LIKE TO BE ABLE TO TAKE THOSE MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS AND PULL THEM OFF OF THOSE STATE PROJECTS AND USE THEM FOR OFF STATE ON THE OFF STATE SYSTEM. AGAIN, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE COLLABORATIVELY WORKING WITH THE DOT ON, BUT WE THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT, JUST GIVEN THE TIMING OF ALL OF THIS AND HOW YOU KNOW, HOW COMPRESSED EVERYTHING IS, THAT WE WOULD LET THE TAC KNOW.

AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'LL BE SHARING WITH THE CAC AS WELL.

SO AGAIN, WE JUST WANTED TO TO INFORM THE TAC, LET YOU KNOW THAT ON THE MPO STAFF SIDE, WE'VE DONE OUR DUE DILIGENCE IN A FIVE DAY OR SO TIME SPAN AND DISCOVERED THIS AND WE WANTED TO SHARE THAT WITH YOU AS WELL.

SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS, YOU CAN PUSH YOUR LITTLE BUTTON.

THE RTS.

[00:35:05]

[INAUDIBLE] SARA, GO AHEAD.

HI, PETER. SO IN THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION, THERE WAS A STATEMENT MADE THAT THE PROJECT COST HAD INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY.

SO IS THERE IS HOW HOW IS THAT ACCOMMODATED WHEN YOU HAVE THESE? BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT CONSTRUCTION COSTS HAVE GONE UP, MATERIALS HAVE GONE UP, AND THEY ARE PROBABLY GOING TO CONTINUE TO GO UP.

AND SO HOW ARE WE ADJUSTING OUR EXPECTATIONS BASED ON THIS? SO I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK DIRECTLY FOR THE DEPARTMENT, BUT I CAN TELL YOU WHAT WE'VE EXPERIENCED JUST WHILE WE'RE WORKING WITH THE DEPARTMENT IS THAT, OF COURSE, YES, PROJECT COSTS ARE GOING UP. AND TYPICALLY WHEN YOU HAVE MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS ON AN OFF SYSTEM PROJECT, WHEN THAT PROJECT COST INCREASES, YOU HAVE TO USE MORE ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS IN ORDER TO BACKFILL THAT.

RIGHT. WHAT WE'VE NOTICED ON THIS LIST HERE SPECIFICALLY IS A LOT OF THESE PROJECTS WERE ALL STATE FUNDED IN THE LAST TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.

THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY FEDERAL MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDING ON THEM.

BUT NOW AS PART OF THIS DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM, THEY DID HAVE MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDING ON THEM.

SO IS THERE AN ASSUMPTION THAT MAYBE THE COST INCREASE LED TO THEM UTILIZING MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS TO PUT ON THOSE PROJECTS? MAYBE. I DON'T WANT TO NECESSARILY MAKE THAT ASSUMPTION, BUT TYPICALLY SPEAKING, IF WE'RE COMPARTMENTALIZING THE FUNDING AS WE ARE, WHERE STATE FUNDS STAY ON STATE ROADS, OFF SYSTEM ROADS, GET MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDING, ANY COST INCREASES WILL BE ABSORBED BY THAT FUNDING SOURCE, IF THAT MAKES SENSE.

BUT WE'RE TRYING TO USE ALL THE FUNDING WE HAVE.

SO IF WE HAVE A FUNDING CEILING AND WE'RE SAYING NOW THE COSTS ARE GOING ABOVE THAT CEILING, HOW ARE WE MAKING UP FOR THE DIFFERENCE? SO YOU'RE PROBABLY REFERRING TO THIS SLIDE RIGHT HERE, RIGHT? WHERE HOW ARE WE MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE STAYING BALANCED? THE THE KEY HERE IS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO OUR BEST.

RIGHT. DOES IT COME OUT PERFECTLY? ARE THE REVENUE FORECASTS PERFECT? NO. BUT TYPICALLY SPEAKING, IN ORDER FOR US TO STAY CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN, ONCE AGAIN, GENERALLY WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP STATE FUNDING ON STATE ROADS, MPO ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDING ON OFF SYSTEM FACILITIES.

SO CAN I, CAN I TELL YOU THAT IT'S A ONE FOR ONE AND THAT WE'RE HITTING EXACTLY THOSE TARGETS? IT'S PROBABLY A NO, IT'S A 25 YEAR PLAN.

RIGHT. BUT THAT'S WHY I WAS MENTIONING A $45 MILLION ALLOCATION OF MPO FUNDS ON STATE FACILITIES IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT IN OUR OPINION.

MM HMM. THIS QUESTION IS RELATED TO THERE WAS MENTION OF A RESILIENCY STUDY.

AND SO HERE WE'RE DOING THIS PLANNING.

WE HAVE ALL THESE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'VE BEEN PLANNING FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS PLUS YEARS, AND THERE'S A POSSIBILITY NOW THAT WE HAVE TO DO SOME OTHER IMPROVEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE OUTCOMES OF THESE STUDIES.

HOW DOES THAT FIT INTO THE PROCESS AND WHAT GETS KICKED OFF THE LIST OR PUSHED BACK TO, YOU KNOW, FURTHER DOWN? AND I'M NOT SURE IF I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION.

ARE YOU SAYING IF WE IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS ON A PROJECT IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE, SAY, FOR RESILIENCY? SO TYPICALLY, WHEN IT COMES TO THE WORK PROGRAM, IT'S A FIVE YEAR PLAN.

THE SCOPE IS SET TYPICALLY IN YEAR FIVE, RIGHT? YOU COME YOU COME WITH A SCOPE, WHETHER IT'S BIKE LANE, SIDEWALK, ROADWAY WIDENING.

AND THAT SCOPE HAS TO REMAIN CONSISTENT.

THAT'S NOT TO SAY THAT THINGS DON'T CHANGE, BUT TYPICALLY, IF THERE IS A DESIRE FOR A PROJECT TO ADD IN RESILIENCY ITEMS, ONCE THE PROJECT HAS BEEN PROGRAMED, THAT LIKELY WILL HAVE TO BECOME A SEPARATE PROJECT.

THE CHANCES OF YOU BEING ABLE TO TACK ON AN ENTIRE RESILIENCY ITEM AS PART OF A PROJECT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY SCOPED, SAY, AS A BIKE PED PROJECT, IT'S VERY, VERY DIFFICULT IN ORDER TO DO THAT BECAUSE EACH YEAR REMAINS COST CONSTRAINED WITHIN THE WORK PROGRAM AS WELL.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR PETER? SEEING NONE. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, PETER. SO, BILL, IN LIGHT OF THIS, THERE'S USUALLY A STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

AND BEING THAT IT'S IN THE LAST HOUR OF THIS RECOMMENDATION, DO YOU HAVE A RECOMMENDATION? SURE. I SEEM TO HAVE A SHORTAGE OF WORKING MICROPHONE.

SO BILL CROSS BROWARD MPO.

YEAH. YOU KNOW, I THINK KAREN, AS YOU STATED AT THE BEGINNING, RIGHT, WE KNOW THAT THIS TENDS TO COME TO US THIS WAY WITH A VERY COMPRESSED TIME FRAME.

SO AS PETER MENTIONED, YOU KNOW, WE'RE STILL ACTIVELY WORKING WITH, WITH FDOT ON SOME THINGS.

[00:40:07]

SO WE'RE JUST NOT PREPARED TODAY TO HAVE A STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON ON ANY OF THIS.

WE'RE WORKING HARD TO GET THERE FOR THE BOARD, SO IT'S REALLY AT YOUR PLEASURE AND THE GROUP'S PLEASURE HOW YOU'D LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD.

YOU KNOW, WE CERTAINLY LIKE TO GET A RECOMMENDATION FROM YOU.

YOU KNOW, IF YOU HAVE A RECOMMENDATION WITH A CAVEAT OR STATEMENT, THAT WOULD BE FINE AS WELL.

BUT IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO GET THAT BECAUSE OUR OUR DECEMBER BOARD MEETING, YOU KNOW, IN ORDER TO KEEP THE PROCESS MOVING AND TO MEET DOTS TIME FRAMES, WE REALLY DO NEED A BOARD APPROVAL.

SO, AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE THAT WE'RE ALWAYS IN THIS TIGHT TIME FRAME WITH THIS IMPORTANT DOCUMENT, BUT IT IS I'M NOT GOING TO SAY WHAT PETER SAID.

SO BUT HERE WE ARE.

OKAY. TOM.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. SO RECOGNIZING THAT THERE'S A TIME FRAME, BUT ALSO RECOGNIZING THAT MAYBE A LITTLE BIT MORE WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE.

I MEAN, MAYBE WE CAN, YOU KNOW, APPROVE THIS BECAUSE THIS IS A THIS IS THE DRAFT, RIGHT? THIS IS THE TENTATIVE I MEAN, IT'S STILL GOT TO COME BACK TO US AGAIN AS A AS A TIP OR NO.

SO WE GET ANOTHER ANOTHER BITE AT THE APPLE ON THIS, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.

YES. YES, SIR. THAT'S CORRECT.

AND THAT'S AN EXCELLENT QUESTION.

AND THE POINT IS THAT THIS IS THE DRAFT TENTATIVE.

SO, IN EFFECT, YOU WILL SEE THIS AGAIN, WE WILL USE THIS ALONG WITH SOME MODIFICATIONS THAT COME ALONG OVER THE COMING MONTHS, WILL FORM THE BASIS OF THE TIP THAT THIS GROUP WILL SEE AGAIN, WITH A A MUCH MORE REASONABLE TIME FRAME SO THAT YOU CAN STUDY IT AND REALLY BE COMFORTABLE WITH IT. THANK YOU.

AND SO, MADAM CHAIR, I MEAN, MAYBE MAYBE IT DOESN'T HURT FOR US TO GO AHEAD AND APPROVE THIS TODAY, BUT WITH THE WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE MPO STAFF IS TO WORK WITH THE DOT STAFF IN ORDER TO GET US IN AN ALIGNMENT THAT WE NEED TO BE IN.

AND THEN IF WE'RE NOT IN THAT ALIGNMENT, BY THE TIME THE TIP COMES BACK TO US, THEN WE CAN TAKE ACTION THEN.

SO I DON'T I DON'T I DON'T THINK IT WOULD HURT US TO APPROVE IT TODAY WITH THAT CONDITION THAT THE MPO STAFF WORKS WITH THE DOT STAFF FOR THE ALIGNMENT FOR THE LONG RANGE PLAN.

I THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA IN USING IT TO ADVISE OUR BOARD MEMBERS OF OUR CONCERNS.

BUT YOU KNOW, IT IS JUST A RECOMMENDATION FOR THEM AND WHAT OUR CONCERNS ARE.

LIKE YOU SAID, WE WORK WITH THE MPO, THEY WORK WITH THE MPO ON THE OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON PROJECTS THAT FOLKS HAVE HAD FOR THEM.

SO IT'S CONTINGENT ON THAT.

I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA.

I DON'T KNOW. THAT WOULD BE MY ADDED TO THE MOTION.

SO JUST WE ALREADY HAD A MOTION OR HOW DO YOU DO A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT IN THE ELECTRONIC WORLD? I DON'T KNOW. REBECCA, CAN WE CLEAR OUT THE PRIOR MOTION AND TAKE ANOTHER ONE? FORTUNATELY, FORTUNATELY, WE DO NOT HAVE AN ATTORNEY PRESENT HERE TODAY, SO I THINK WE CAN GET AWAY WITH THAT.

I THINK. CAN IT JUST BE REFLECTED IN THE NOTES THAT THAT THIS WAS APPROVED WITH, YOU KNOW, A CONDITION? YES. I MEAN, THAT I MEAN, IT'S STILL THE SAME MOTION.

IT WOULD JUST BE WITH THE ADDED CONDITION.

AND SO MAYBE WE COULD JUST TAKE THAT AS A.

AND THE FIRST MOTION DID HAVE WE TALKED ABOUT CONDITIONS, BUT WE NEVER GOT TO TALK THROUGH IT BECAUSE WE HAD THE OTHER PRESENTATION.

SO IT WAS ALWAYS KIND OF CONTINGENT ON.

SO I'M COMFORTABLE WITH THAT.

PLOW FORWARD CHAIR. YES.

OKAY, EXCELLENT.

CAN YOU RESTATE THAT? TOM YEAH, I JUST AGAIN, THAT WE APPROVE THE DRAFT WITH THE CONDITION THAT MPO STAFF WORKS WITH THE DOT STAFF IN ORDER TO ENSURE ALIGNMENT WITH THE LONG RANGE PLAN.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. GOOD. SECONDED BY LUISE AGUILAR.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO VOTE.

I'M WAITING ON MR. COYLE. THANK YOU.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU. MOTION PASSES.

[3. MOTION TO RECOMMEND BROWARD MPO APPROVE the Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) Draft Tentative Five-Year Work Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 - 2028]

WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT ACTION ITEM, WHICH IS TO MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE BROWARD MPO APPROVE THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE DRAFT TENTATIVE FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 24 TO 28.

[00:45:04]

AND WE HAVE MS. WILLIAMS HERE TODAY. YES, MA'AM.

HI, VICTORIA WILLIAMS. I'M THE TURNPIKES LIAISON ADMINISTRATOR.

TODAY, JAMES BROWN IS WITH ME.

HE'S OUR TURNPIKE LIAISON TO THE MPO.

AND SO OUR PRESENTATION WILL JUST GO OVER BRIEFLY THE DOLLARS THAT WE'RE ABLE TO SPEND AND TOWARDS IMPROVEMENTS IN BROWARD COUNTY IN FISCAL YEAR 22 AND 23, WE WORKED ON INTERCHANGES AT COCONUT CREEK SAMPLE AND ATLANTIC AND SOME RESURFACING ON THE MAIN LINE.

SO IF WE GO TO OUR NEXT SLIDE, AM I IN CONTROL OF THAT REBECA? OKAY. THANK YOU, MA'AM. THIS IS A DEPICTION OF THOSE ROADWAYS THAT MAKE UP THE FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE SYSTEM.

THE ADDITIONAL MILEAGE, THE 48 YOU SEE WITH THE ASTERISK IS UP NEAR JACKSONVILLE, FIRST COAST EXPRESSWAY.

SO WE HAVE THESE DIFFERENT FACILITIES STATEWIDE AND WE ARE A SYSTEM OF ROADWAYS, LIMITED ACCESS, PROVIDING SAFE, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE MEANS OF TRAVEL.

LOCATED IN 19 COUNTIES IN FLORIDA.

WE'VE LOOKED HERE THE LITTLE RED BOX AT YOUR COUNTY, BROWARD, HAS THREE OF OUR FACILITIES.

YOU TOUCH BRIEFLY ON THE TOP OF STATE ROAD 821 OUR TURNPIKE EXTENSION MAIN LINE GOES DOWN INTO DADE.

BUT OF COURSE, THE MAIN ROADS HERE ARE THE MAIN LINES STATE ROAD 91 AND STATE ROAD 826.

THE TURNPIKE IS A PART OF FDOT.

IT'S FOLLOWING THE SAME TYPE OF VISION AND DO SUPPORT THOSE MISSION STATEMENTS THAT YOU SEE FOR THE DEPARTMENT.

THE TURNPIKE FACILITY WAS BUILT IN 1957, BUT THE TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE WASN'T CREATED UNTIL 20 YEARS AGO.

IT'S OUR ANNIVERSARY 2002 THEY CREATED THE ENTITY KNOWN AS FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE.

AND SO THEREFORE, I'M POINTING OUT OUR MISSION AND VISION IS NOT ONLY TO MEET THE STATE'S TRANSPORTATION NEEDS, BUT WE'D LIKE TO ENSURE VALUE TO THE CUSTOMERS USING THE ROAD, PROTECTING THE INVESTORS THAT WE HOLD THE BONDS AND MANAGING THE SYSTEM IN A BUSINESSLIKE, EFFICIENT MANNER. THIS GROWING TRANSPORTATION NEED IS REPRESENTED HERE ON THIS SLIDE.

WE HAVE SEEN IN THE 20 YEARS A GROWTH OF 31% IN THE POPULATION, BUT 37% MORE CARS ON OUR FACILITIES AS WELL AS WHAT'S THAT STATISTIC HERE? JAMES WROTE IT IN FOR ME. THANK YOU, SIR 80% INCREASE IN VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ON THE SYSTEM.

WE HAVE BEEN INCREASING THE SYSTEM, BUT BIG GROWTH POINT BEING, THIS ALSO INCLUDES COMMERCIAL VEHICLES.

WE'RE SEEING, OF COURSE, A BIG CHANGE IN OUR CULTURE, A LOT MORE DELIVERY VEHICLES ON THE ROAD.

SO THIS REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SLIDE WANTS TO EDUCATE ABOUT HOW THE TURNPIKE RECEIVES FUNDING.

THERE IS NO FEDERAL FUNDS.

THERE ARE ONLY THE USER FEES, THE TOLLS AND SOME MONEY FROM CONCESSIONAIRES.

THE PEOPLE THAT ARE USING THE SERVICE PLAZA FACILITIES.

ACCORDING TO THE BOND COVENANTS, FOR THOSE DOLLARS THAT WE USE FOR CONSTRUCTION, WE HAVE TO PAY FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE TO KEEP THAT ROADWAY UP FIRST. IT ALSO INCLUDES COSTS TO COLLECT THE TOLLS WHICH ARE BEST PAID BY TRANSPONDER.

YOU'LL PAY LESS TOLL AMOUNT AND IF YOU DON'T, YOU'LL HAVE NO OPPORTUNITY ANYMORE TO PAY CASH, RIGHT.

SO THEY TAKE A PICTURE OF YOUR LICENSE PLATE AND SEND THE BILL TO THE OWNER OF THE CAR IS THE HIGHER TOLL RATE AND WE HAVE TO CHARGE THE MAILING COST.

SO IT IS VERY EFFICIENT USING A PREPAID TOLL ACCOUNT.

WE'RE INTEROPERABLE NOW WITH NORTHEAST CORRIDOR.

SO TYPE OF TRANSPONDER IS VERY EFFICIENT TO HAVE.

AND IF YOU WANT TO USE OUR THREE LANES, YOU MUST BE CARRYING A TRANSPONDER.

WE HAVE A REAL HIGH CREDIT RATING ON THOSE BONDS.

WE'RE ENJOYING A VERY LOW INTEREST RATE BECAUSE OF THAT.

WE'RE GOING TO INVEST THE REST OF THE MONEY INTO RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT, MAKING SURE THAT WE REPAVE AND KEEP IT SAFE AND SOUND, THAT IT WILL INCLUDE GUARDRAIL AND SUCH PAVEMENT MARKINGS, WHICH ARE VERY IMPORTANT NOW WITH ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND CONNECTED VEHICLES.

FINALLY, WE USE THE MONEY TO PAY FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS LIKE THESE, THE WIDENING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS.

HOW DO WE PRIORITIZE OUR NEEDS? WE LOOK AT IT ANNUALLY.

WE HAVE A TRAFFIC TRENDS REPORT AND IT PRIORITIZES THAT BIG SYSTEM INTO NEED.

WE FORECAST USING THOSE STATISTICS DEVELOPED BY COUNTIES TELLING US HOW THE GROWTH WILL OCCUR AND WE INCORPORATE THOSE INTO OUR TRENDS ANALYSIS TO SEE ACROSS OUR SYSTEM WHAT THE NEEDS ARE.

WE HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE A PRIORITIZING.

WE HAVE ALWAYS HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE A NEED.

WE ALWAYS HAVE TO LOOK AT STAKEHOLDER INPUT.

WE TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY.

IT'S GOT TO WORK FOR US.

[00:50:01]

IT'S GOT TO WORK FOR THE COMMUNITY.

AND SO OUR STAKEHOLDER IMPROVEMENT INCLUDES PARTNERSHIPS.

SOMETIMES THE CITY WILL COME TO US AND WE HELP WORK THROUGH TO ACCOMMODATE NEEDS THAT TO MAKE THEM FEASIBLE.

SOMETIMES IT COULD BE A DEVELOPER OR A COUNTY.

HERE'S THE DOLLARS, HERE'S THE MAP, HERE'S THE PROJECTS.

WE HAVE FOUR PAGES TO SHOW YOU HERE.

THESE ARE JUST THE MAJOR PROJECTS, AND THIS MAP WILL START US NEAR THE BOTTOM ON THE MAINLINE TURNPIKE.

HERE YOU WILL SEE A RECAP OF THE PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE.

A LOT OF THEM ARE M&O WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO ADD AN AUXILIARY LANE TO MAKE OPERATIONS GO EASIER.

YOU'LL SEE A LOT OF THIS FUNDING IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS.

IT'S NOT STRETCHED OUT TO LAST YEAR.

WE'VE GOT A LITTLE RESURFACING THERE ALSO ON THE MAIN LINE.

LET'S LOOK NOW AT SAWGRASS EXPRESSWAY STARTING DOWN AT THE BOTTOM.

WE'RE LOOKING AT MILEPOST FOUR, ACTUALLY INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS AT MILEPOST FIVE.

OH, YEAH.

SAWGRASS EXPRESSWAY.

CORRECT. NORTH OF OAKLAND.

THAT'S THE ONE THAT WE'RE GOING TO RUN.

WE'VE GOT A LOT OF MONEY SITTING THERE FOR ALL PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.

AND THEN COMING DOWN, I'M SORRY, GOING NORTH.

YOU'LL SEE MORE MONEY SCHEDULED TO IMPROVE FROM MILEPOST ZERO FURTHER UP.

INTERCHANGES ARE GOING TO BE WORKED ON THERE AS WELL.

THE PARTNERSHIP WITH BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OF SUNRISE IS ON THAT SECOND PROJECT THERE, THE $308 MILLION WIDENING THE SAWGRASS FROM SOUTH OF NORTHWEST 8TH STREET WILL INCLUDE A NEW INTERCHANGE AT NORTHWEST 8TH STREET.

CONTINUING FURTHER NORTH ON THAT EDGE OF SAWGRASS EXPRESSWAY.

YOU'LL SEE WIDENING THERE.

THE ANALYSIS OF FUNDING THAT IS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND THE YEARS THAT WE ANTICIPATE THAT TO OCCUR ON THOSE MILES THAT YOU SEE ON THE MAP.

AND THEN THE LAST SECTION IS SAWGRASS EXPRESSWAY CONNECTOR, WHERE WE'RE WORKING IN A PARTNERSHIP WITH DISTRICT FOUR, AS WELL AS THE RESURFACING. SO THIS SHOWS YOU HOW TO GET ALL THE DETAILS.

WE DO HAVE SOME INFORMATION ONLINE AT THAT WEBSITE.

PARDON ME, BUT I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT SOMETHING NOT ON THE SLIDE THAT YOU WILL SEE IN THE DISTRICT FOUR WORK PROGRAM.

THE LAST PAGE HAS NINE PROJECTS IN BROWARD THAT ARE [INAUDIBLE] STUDY OR PE DESIGN PROJECTS WITHOUT CONSTRUCTION.

THERE'S ABOUT $70 MILLION TO IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL LANE WIDENING GOING BASICALLY FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE COUNTY UP TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY LINE.

AND THEN ONE IS GOING TO ADD A NEW IS GOING TO STUDY, ADDING A NEW INTERCHANGE AT OAKLAND PARK FOR $12,000,225.

AND THERE IS ONE TO IMPLEMENT OUR THREE LANES WHICH ARE SIMILAR TO EXPRESS LANES, BUT WE'LL HAVE LESS OPPORTUNITY TO GO IN AND OUT.

BUT THERE WILL NOT BE AN ADDITIONAL TOLL ON THOSE LANES.

SO THOSE ARE GOING TO BE SHOWN TO YOU.

THEY'RE NOT INCLUDED IN OUR MAIN NUMBERS ON OUR ANALYSIS, BUT WHAT WE SEE HERE IN GRAND TOTAL OF MAJOR PROJECTS IN BROWARD COUNTY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS IS $1 BILLION. $200 MILLION IN THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS AND THEN THOSE [INAUDIBLE] THAT I MENTIONED.

SO IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO TAKE THEM.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TURNPIKE WORK PROGRAM? MICHAEL. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

VICTORIA. GOOD AFTERNOON.

CAN YOU GO BACK TO YOUR SLIDE THAT SHOWS THE SAWGRASS? WHICH SEGMENT [INAUDIBLE].

THAT ONE RIGHT THERE. YEAH, THAT'S.

THAT'S GOOD. YES, OF COURSE.

COCONUT CREEK. YES, SIR.

SO CITY OF COCONUT CREEK HAD THE PLEASURE OF MEETING WITH THE TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE ON THE INTERCHANGE FOR THE SAWGRASS COMPONENT.

OKAY, SO I'M GLAD FDOT IS HERE AS WELL.

THE 10TH STREET CONNECTOR CITY OF COCONUT CREEK WAS ALSO INSTRUMENTAL IN WORKING WITH DOT DEERFIELD BEACH AND RESOLVING SOME OF THE ISSUES WITH THE 10TH STREET CONNECTOR.

BUT THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE ENTITIES DOING TWO SEPARATE PROJECTS, AND I THINK WE WOULD ALL AGREE THAT THE INTERCHANGE AT THAT LOCATION IS A LARGE SCALE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT.

HOWEVER, IT STILL HAS SOME DEFICIENCIES.

[00:55:02]

IT DOESN'T PROVIDE FULL ACCESS AS AN INTERCHANGE COMPONENT.

SO I JUST WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE YOUR CONTINUING COLLABORATION WITH ALL THE AGENCIES INVOLVED TO TRY TO RESOLVE THAT ISSUE AS YOU GUYS MOVE FORWARD THROUGH YOUR PD&E PROCESS.

THANK YOU FOR THAT COMMENT.

WE WILL BE BRINGING OUR PROJECT MANAGER TO THIS BODY TO GIVE A PRESENTATION.

OF COURSE, WE'LL FOLLOW ALL OF OUR PROCESSES TO RUN THROUGH OUR PUBLIC FEEDBACK AND GAUGE THAT ACCORDINGLY TO WORK THROUGH SOME OF THOSE ISSUES.

I BELIEVE PROBABLY YOU'RE SPEAKING THAN PERHAPS FROM THE LIONS ROAD TURNING MOVEMENT.

THERE HAVE BEEN A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT PROPOSALS FOR THAT LARGE INTERCHANGE.

WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP IT FROM BEING TOO TALL AND GOING UP HIGHER THAT THOSE COMMUNITIES ALONG THE MAIN CONNECTOR SUGGESTED WOULD BE A PROBLEM.

SO KEEPING IT, YOU KNOW, FROM GOING A THIRD LAYER UP ON THE ROADWAY IS ALSO A PART OF THE ANALYSIS.

THEY HAVE SOME OPTIONS.

SO WHAT I'VE LIKE IS THAT I'VE SEEN THEM MOVING TOWARDS INCORPORATING A LOT OF THAT FEEDBACK AND SEEING IF THERE'S A WAY WE CAN CONTINUE TO WORK WITH YOU.

I MADE A NOTE.

I'M GOING TO TELL THE PROJECT MANAGER ABOUT IT AND MAKE SURE THEY CONTINUE TO REACH OUT.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER SPECIFICS ABOUT IT THAT I CAN TAKE BACK? OTHERWISE YOU CAN ALWAYS CONTACT ME.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO SEEING NONE.

THANK YOU. SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO MAKE THE MOTION FOR THIS ITEM, WHICH IS TO RECOMMEND TO THE MPO APPROVAL OF THE TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE DRAFT TENTATIVE FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM FOR 24 TO 28. THE MOTION WAS MADE BY MAQSOOD.

WE'RE LOOKING FOR A SECOND.

SECONDED BY NATALIE.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS ABOUT THE DRAFT WORK PROGRAM BEFORE WE DO A VOTE? NO. SEEING NONE.

NOW WE WILL TAKE THE VOTE.

OKAY. MOTION PASSES.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, EVERYONE.

[4. **MOTION TO RECOMMEND BROWARD MPO APPROVE an Amendment to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2027 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - FM #436564-1: Loxahatchee Road From Arthur Marshall Loxahatchee Refuge to SR-7/US-441]

WE WILL NOW MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM, WHICH IS A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE BROWARD MPO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 23 TO 27 TIP, WHICH IS OUR CURRENT TIP REGARDING THE LOXAHATCHEE ROAD PROJECT FROM ARTHUR MARSHALL LOXAHATCHEE REFUGE TO US FOR 41.

AND CAN WE JUST GET A QUICK WHAT IT'S ABOUT? I DON'T KNOW IF JEFFREY WANTS BILLS MIC DOESN'T WORK [INAUDIBLE] GETTING HIS EXERCISE TODAY UP AND DOWN.

YOU SAW THEM. THEY TOLD ME THAT I FIXED IT AND I WAS THE CRAZY ONE.

BUT NO, IT'S SO YEAH, THIS IS THIS IS AN IMPORTANT AMENDMENT AND I THINK A REALLY POSITIVE ONE FOR OUR REGION.

I THINK MOST OF YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN WORKING COLLABORATIVELY WITH A BUNCH OF PARTNERS TRYING TO GET LOXAHATCHEE ROAD MOVING FORWARD FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW.

THIS IS ANOTHER PROJECT THAT WAS HIT BY SOME COST INCREASES.

SO THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF A LAST MINUTE DISCUSSION BACK AND FORTH ABOUT HOW TO HOW TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT PROJECT.

ULTIMATELY, BROWARD COUNTY CAME TO THE TABLE WITH SOME ADDITIONAL RESOURCES, I BELIEVE, THROUGH THEIR SURTAX.

BUT ANYWAY, THAT PROJECT IS NOW READY TO MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE OF THE MAGNITUDE OF THAT CHANGE.

IT DID REQUIRE A TIP AMENDMENT.

THAT'S WHY IT'S HERE TODAY.

AGAIN, DOT IS TRYING TO UPHOLD THEIR COMMITMENT FOR, I WANT TO SAY, A MARCH LETTING.

I COULD BE WRONG ON THAT. BUT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A PRETTY AGGRESSIVE SCHEDULE [INAUDIBLE].

YEAH. OKAY, GOOD. I GOT IT RIGHT.

SO. OKAY, SO I GUESS THAT'S IT FOR ME.

BUT GOOD, GOOD PROJECT.

WE WOULD ASK FOR APPROVAL.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU, BILL.

ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE BEFORE WE MOVE IT TO A VOTE? NO. EXCELLENT.

ASK FOR A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE BROWARD MPO BOARD APPROVE THE TIP AMENDMENT FOR THE LOXAHATCHEE ROAD PROJECT.

MOTIONS MADE BY MAQSOOD.

SECONDED BY PETE.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS? QUESTIONS. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE IT TO A VOTE.

[01:00:08]

WE LOST MAGGIE.

WE LOSE SUSAN, TOO. OKAY.

MOTION PASSES.

THANK YOU. NOW, WHEN WE MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS THE MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE BUDGET MPO APPROVE TARGETS FOR THE FEDERALLY MANDATED PERFORMANCE

[5. MOTION TO RECOMMEND BROWARD MPO APPROVE Targets for the Federally Mandated Performance Measure Areas]

MEASURES. AND WE HAVE MR. FLAVIEN HERE.

GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR.

MEMBERS OF THE CAC PAUL FLAVIN WITH THE BROAD MPO STAFF MEMBER TASKED WITH MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW IN REGARDS TO PERFORMANCE MEASURES. YES, AS YOU SAID TODAY, WE ARE HERE TO PROVIDE YOU THE PROPOSED TARGETS THAT WE'D LIKE FOR YOU TO RECOMMEND TO THE BOARD TO ADOPT AT THE DECEMBER MEETING.

AND WITH THAT, I'LL START.

AS YOU KNOW, EVERY TIME WE TALK ABOUT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, WE NEED TO REFERENCE THE LAWS THAT BROUGHT THEM ABOUT.

AND THEY ARE RIGHT THERE FOR YOU, FOR YOU TO LOOK AT MAP 21 AND FAST ACT.

ALSO, PERFORMANCE MEASURES.

WHY DO WHY DO WE DO THEM AGAIN EVERY TIME WE TALK ABOUT THEM, WE WANT TO TELL YOU WHY WE'RE ACTUALLY DOING THIS.

AND AGAIN, I WILL READ THIS AND YOU GO THROUGH FOR YOURSELF WHAT ARE REQUIRED TO MEASURE.

THESE ARE THE ITEMS THAT WERE REQUIRED TO MEASURE AND SET TARGETS FOR SAFETY, WHICH IS THE MOST IMPORTANT, OBVIOUSLY, BRIDGE AND PAVEMENT CONDITIONS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, WHICH IS TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY FOR VEHICLES AND TRUCKS, TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT AND ALSO TRANSIT SAFETY.

SO YOU WILL NOTICE THE LITTLE ASTERISKS BY THESE ITEMS, THE ONES WITH ONE ASTERISK ARE YEARLY TARGETS THAT WE SET, THE ONES WITH TWO ASTERISKS, ALL THE ONES THAT WE SET EVERY FOUR YEARS.

SO TODAY ACTUALLY IS THE DAY WE'LL BE ADOPTING ALL WELL, WE'D LIKE YOU TO RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD ADOPTS ALL OF THESE PERFORMANCE MEASURE TARGETS.

SO WITH THAT, AGAIN, FOR FOR SAFETY, OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, OUR VISION IS TO HAVE ZERO FATALITIES ON THE ROADWAYS.

SO WE ARE MAINTAINING THAT ZERO SAFETY TARGET, YOU KNOW, IN SUPPORT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND ESSENTIALLY MOST OF THE MPOS IN THE STATE AS WELL.

THE COLUMN OVER TO THE RIGHT ESSENTIALLY IS THE CURRENT DATA THAT WE HAVE.

WE DON'T HAVE 17 TO 21 DATA, WHICH WOULD BE THE LATEST DATA.

I'M SURE WE'LL BE PROVIDED THAT INFORMATION BY THE DOT SOMETIME EARLY IN DECEMBER.

AND AS A SHAMELESS PLUG, ONCE WE GET THAT DATA, WE'LL BE UPDATING OUR PERFORMANCE MEASURE DASHBOARD, WHICH WILL ALSO BE PRESENTING TO YOU SOMETIME IN THE WINTER OF NEXT YEAR.

SO, YOU KNOW, ALL OF YOU ARE INTO DATA.

SOMETHING TO LOOK FORWARD TO.

AGAIN, WE'RE PROPOSING A ZERO SAFETY TARGET.

AND ALSO FROM THE LAST LAST PRESENTATION I WAS HERE, I WAS IN HERE, MY COLLEAGUE PETER REESE MADE THE PRESENTATION AND HE HEARD SOME FEEDBACK ABOUT WE HAD THE SLIDE ABOUT OVERALL TRENDS, BUT AGAIN, IT WAS OVERALL RIGHT AND THERE WERE QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT ABOUT PED AND BIKE.

SO I ADDED AN ADDITIONAL SLIDE.

SO AGAIN, WE STILL HAVE THE VEHICLES AND THEN I ADDED THE, THE SLIDE FOR THE TREND, SLIDE FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN.

AGAIN, WE'RE LOOKING BACK FROM 2011 TO 2020.

THIS IS THE YEARLY DATA AND THIS IS THE FIVE YEAR TREND DATA.

YOU CAN SEE WE'RE ACTUALLY DOING A LITTLE DOING BETTER HERE WITH BICYCLES, BUT AS YOU SEE FOR PEDESTRIANS, NOT SO, NOT SO, NOT SO GOOD. THE TREND LINE IS GOING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION THAT WE LIKE IT TO GO.

AND AGAIN, WE'RE LOOKING AT FATALITIES.

THIS IS FATALITY DATA.

SO MOVING ON TO BRIDGE AND PAVEMENT CONDITIONS AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, WE'RE ACTUALLY NOT CHANGING TARGETS.

THE STATE HAS ADOPTED THESE TARGETS AND WE'RE SUPPORTING THEM IN THE SETTING OF THOSE TARGETS.

SO THE TARGETS REMAIN THE SAME.

AND THE INFORMATION YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT, THE LAST COLUMN IS THE CURRENT DATA THAT WE HAVE.

NOW THIS IS CURRENT DATA SO.

WE'RE PROPOSING THESE TARGETS FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT TARGETS.

AGAIN, THIS INFORMATION IS ESSENTIALLY A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT AND ALSO SFRTA.

SO WE TAKE THEIR TARGETS AND ESSENTIALLY COMBINE THEM AND WHERE IT'S RELEVANT, YOU KNOW, WE MAKE ADJUSTMENTS.

SO AGAIN, PROPOSED TARGETS FOR THIS YEAR.

TRANSIT SAFETY. NOW, THIS IS JUST FROM INFORMATION WE RECEIVED FROM BCBT.

AS I SAID, RCA IS NOT REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THIS STATUTE BECAUSE THEY ARE UNDER THE PURVIEW OF THE FRA AND THEY HAVE SAFETY PROTOCOLS THAT THEY FOLLOW.

AND WITH THAT, THOSE ARE ALL THE TARGETS.

[01:05:03]

AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION OR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE FOR ME AT THIS POINT.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU, PAUL. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE ITEM? NO. EXCELLENT.

THANK YOU FOR THE QUICK PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND TO THE BOARD THAT WE ADOPT THE TARGETS FOR THE FEDERALLY MANDATED PERFORMANCE MEASURES.

MOTION WAS MADE BY MAQSOOD AND SECONDED BY SARA.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE WILL MOVE THIS TO A VOTE.

WORKED. OKAY.

MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU.

[6. MOTION TO RECOMMEND BROWARD MPO APPROVE the Complete Streets and Other Localized Initiatives Program (CSLIP) Cycle 7 Priority List of Projects, Directing MPO Staff to Work with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Staff on the Vetting and Programing of Viable Projects]

WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR LAST ACTION ITEM FOR THE DAY, WHICH IS A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE MPO APPROVE THE COMPLETE STREETS AND OTHER LOCALIZED INITIATIVE CYCLE SEVEN PRIORITIES LIST PROJECT AND DIRECTING MPO STAFF TO WORK WITH THE DOT ON VETTING AND PROGRAMING OF VIABLE PROJECTS.

AND WE HAVE KERRIE HERE TODAY.

HI. GOOD AFTERNOON. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

MY NAME IS KERRIE MACNEIL, BROWARD MPO STAFF MANAGING THE CSLIP PROGRAM.

SO COMING TO YOU TODAY WITH AN UPDATE ON THE CYCLE SIX AND ALSO CYCLE SEVEN OF CSLIP.

SO THE DRAFT PRIORITY LIST IS WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION ON FOR TODAY.

SO WE CAN MOVE ON TO THE NEXT SLIDE, ACTUALLY.

ALL RIGHT. SO JUST TO RECAP, THE MISSION IS TO COLLABORATE COLLABORATIVELY, PLAN, PRIORITIZE AND FUND THE DELIVERY OF DIVERSE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS AND THE MPOS COMPLETE STREETS AND OTHER LOCALIZED INITIATIVES PROGRAM OR CSLIP, PROVIDES FUNDING FOR SMALL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS WHICH IMPROVE THE SAFETY AND MOBILITY FOR ALL TRANSPORTATION USERS IN BROWARD COUNTY.

SO CLSIP JUST A REMINDER, IT'S A COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM THAT CAN FUND PROJECTS SUCH AS COMPLETE STREETS PROJECTS, TRAFFIC CALMING INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, ADA UPGRADES, MOBILITY HUBS, BIKE RACKS, TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENTS SUCH AS TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.

SO CYCLE SIX, IF YOU REMEMBER, WE CAME TO YOU WITH THE CYCLE SIX PRIORITY LIST OF PROJECTS ABOUT A YEAR AGO AND CYCLE SIX WILL BE AWARDED WHEN THE DRAFT FDOT DRAFT TENTATIVE WORK PROGRAM IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD, HOPEFULLY ON DECEMBER 8TH. SO AFTER THAT MEETING, YOU KEEP AN EYE OUT.

ANYBODY WHO IS AWARDED ANY AGENCY WHO WAS AWARDED A PROJECT FROM CYCLE SIX WILL RECEIVE A MAILED LETTER AND ALSO A DIGITAL COPY OF A LETTER NOTIFYING THEM OF THEIR PROJECT BEING AWARDED AND PROGRAM FOR FUNDING.

AND THAT CYCLE SIX PROGRAM LIST OF PROJECTS WILL ALSO BE POSTED ON OUR CSLIP WEBSITE ON THE PAST AWARDS PAGE.